Skip to Content

Chai Time News

Today Latest News

Most Capped Rugby Players Expert Interview

Most Capped Rugby Players Expert Interview

Be First!
by May 17, 2020 Sports

Most Capped Rugby Players Among the modifications proposed by the French Rugby Federation and the National Rugby League stands out the one that proposes to expand to twelve! the substitutions

Most Capped Rugby Players Mistakes You Can Fix Today

Most Capped Rugby Players Mistakes You Can Fix Today

Rugby’s incorruptible oracle, its rules, have been tampered with for years under the pretext of safeguarding the safety of the players. A stream of controversial decisions watched with suspicion by its practitioners, that actually try to hide the devastating effect of professionalism. The turning point occurred in 1995 when rugby ended with 172 years of amateurism. Dotted, needless to say, with numerous and undisguised remuneration practices that ended up plunging this sport into shady semi-professionalism.

The arrival of professionalism structurally changed the concept of oval sport. The first consequence was the growth of some players who multiplied their power and speed. What made the sport more spectacular, a feature, by the way, that was never a priority of rugby. But those faster, bigger, and more powerful players began to suffer more serious and more frequent injuries because the percussions were more powerful and more devastating.

The Undeniable Truth About Most Capped Rugby Players That No One Is Telling You

The troubling proliferation of concussions has been the most obvious symptom that something isn’t working in the new rugby. Concussions always existed, but not with the current frequency. The effects of rugby ‘televising’ have also been momentous in changing the dynamics of the game. Rules began to appear that deactivated classic phases such as melee and maul, the least attractive to spectators when they lost sight of the ball. The open play was promoted, where the speed and spectacular percussion act as a hook to increase audiences with new customers.

A few weeks ago, France released a highly controversial package of experimental measures with the aim, once again, of “preserving the safety of players.” The proposal comes endorsed by the bombastic Medical Observatory of the French Rugby Federation and the National Rugby League of that country. Among the proposed modifications stands out the one to expand to twelve! substitutions, allowing players who have left the field to return to it, and the possibility of showing a blue card by the referee to players who show symptoms of concussion.

It is proposed that players replaced for tactical reasons can return to play to replace an injured player, a player with a bleeding wound, a player who has been the subject of a blue card report, a player undergoing protocol concussion or a front-line player temporarily or permanently excluded.

However, behind the increase in substitutions, instead of an improvement in safety, there is an increased risk of injury. A series of physically designed players are being produced to generate maximum impact in a shorter interval of minutes. Players who come out fresh to the field and battle mentally and muscle-tired rivals, multiplying the risk of injury. Players ‘designed’ to play for 80 minutes place more emphasis on aerobic work and tend to be less muscular. The new French proposal also provides the opportunity for players to return to the field after a rest, which would increase the probability of injuring more tired rivals.

There are many former players who have spoken out against the French proposal, especially because the idea that it is necessary to return to the original path and minimize changes is becoming more widespread. Part of the problem lies in the impact of multiple substitutes. When you have the option to train players for limited periods, you can accentuate power and size, with the consequent risk of injury. Adding that some players, less and less, have to play a full game and are inevitably tired, a physical imbalance occurs. And for this reason this trend defends that the increase in substitutions has opposite consequences to those expected.

Regarding the innovation of the blue card, it has been testing for months in New Zealand in provincial competitions. Referees have the power to show a blue card to any player they suspect has suffered a concussion. Something that is understood as a preventive measure, but in reality throws more pressure on the referees, who are already quite guarded.

All these measures have divided the world of rugby. On the one hand there are those who want to preserve the most genuine spirit and equalize the conditions of the players by limiting the substitutions to a minimum and with it the risk of injury. On the other hand, those who are committed to increasing the number of substitutions fueling the spectacle polarization of rugby and increasing the risk of injury due to the impact of players competing in unequal conditions. France has opened the debate.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *